Interesting post on Themis Trading which I picked up via Zero Hedge on the trading investment in data centers. Equity firms spent $1.8B in data centers last year, wow!

The only problem with this trend? Programmers are getting gypped:

"According to our buddies at the Tabb Group, equity firms spent $1.8 billion last year on data centers; half of that total came from sell-side shops.  But even though they are spending tons of cash on the infrastructure, they are not exactly doling out the cash to  their programmers."

Source: Themis Trading.

 

Trying to trade or game this market? Be careful, you can get your head ripped off. That being said, I believe the downtrend has now resumed and that the market is currently a downtrending market. 

I expect we'll revisit sub-1,000 on the S&P again -- more likely even sub-900 -- before the federales start fueling up the helicopters for another money drop. I'd buy the market on a 200-point S&P drop Reasons why I remain negative on the market:

Is leadership finally starting to lead? CEOs and corporate executives, who lead our business climate, have been victim of the same cautious and negative thinking as consumers and investors for a long time. But they may finally be emerging from the psychological funk.

The last few quarters have shown a capital-spending led recovery. Companies are sitting on record piles of cash and free-cash flow, and they are finally starting to invest. This is an important trend that show business leaders are finally finding the will to invest.

This would be a huge trend reversal, if it holds. What's interesting about cash and capital spending, as you can see in the chart below, is that it is not a recent trend established in the last recession. Companies have actually been decreasing their capital spending for the last ten years.

Let's face it, the economic engines won't get humming along until executives start getting a little more confident and start building new things, buying equipment, and hiring people. The equipment buying is starting to happen, which hopefully means the jobs are next. Jobs will be where its at. In fact, there is evidence that business leaders are starting to come out of the long slumber.

Bloomberg has a nice article pointing to this topic today.

RightNow Technologies, a scrappy CRM company that is starting to become a more serious competitor with CRM giants such as SAP's Siebel and Salesforce, just announced a solid quarter in which they continue to make customer and revenue gains.

The company reported GAAP earnings of $1.4 million, or 4 cents per share, for the quarter. The non-GAAP earnings, which analysts use in their estimates, were 9 cents per share, matching the street view. Revenue grew 20 percent from the year-ago period to $43.5 million. But company executives were careful to stress on the call that recurring revenue stream is growing at a 27% clip.

The bandwagon story of the day is Google looking into creating a "Facebook competitor" by talking with popular online gaming companies (Wall Street Journal). That's funny, I thought Facebook was a social networking site and not a gaming company. Shows you what I know.

That's also not to mention that Google has already tried to "do" social networking, but looks to be failing miserably with Buzz.

The spin in the Wall Street Journal is that by talking to social gaming companies like Zynga, Google is contemplating creating an alternative to Facebook, where many of the social gaming companies are growing like weeds (e.g. "Scott has acquired a semi-automatic weapon to blow you away in Mafia Wars!").

Very interesting article by Peter Kafka in AllThingsD this morning about Time Inc.'s frustration with Apple. Apparently Time executives are mystified as to why Apple won't give them control to sell their own subscriptions via an app for the iPad.

Well, I'll tell you why: Apple loves to control the billing relationship. They don't want to give it up. This was the brilliance of iTunes and how they ended up taking control of digital music from the music industry. It was the music industry's huge strategic error. Apple knows that if they control the billing relationship, they control the access to the customer, and therefore can dictate the terms of just about any ecommerce relationship.

Why Time Inc. executives are so "mystified" by this is a mystery to me. Apparently their magazine executives are not talking to executives in the same company that got reamed in the music business. Apple wants to control billing, they want to control pricing, and they want to control the consumer. Period. You want to try to mess with that? Take a hike.

This is one reason why I don't think the iPad will be the "savior" of the media industry that everybody has made it out to be. Unless Apple opens up, and starts sharing a bigger piece of the pie with content and applications producers, it will be the same movie all over again.

The Wall Street Journal pay survey is a fascinating read. My initial impression was surprise that Steve Jobs was only number five. But the thing that shocked me the most is that Barry Diller, the CEO of IACI, is number two on that list, having made $1.14B over the years 2000-1010.

This is egregious. Not because Barry Diller is incompetent. He's a a smart guy, and a media visionary. It's because it's way out of line with what his company did. If you include Expedia shares, an IACI spinoff, IACI shareholders lost 18% over the decade period in which Dillar's compenstation was measured, according to the Wall Street Journal. In fact, IACI alone stock fell 80% during the time that Barry Diller made $1B.

I read somewhere recently that watching the market these days is like watching a squirrel trying to cross the street. It zigs, it zags, you're not sure if it will make it to the forest or get flattened by a bus. Couldn't think of a better metaphor.

How else to explain a market that gives up 8% one month and gains it all back another, only to sell off when consumer confidence numbers are announced? And by the way, how do you explain the fact that the market is at highs while consumer confidence is at a five-month low? The answer: We are all squirrels, zigging and zagging randomly across a economically screwed up landscape, trying to find our way.

If there's any good news to be had, it's that the cost of debt is approaching an all-time low. Greeaaaattttt!!! Go borrow some money (if anybody will lend it to you). Yes, today, the 30-year mortgage yield hit all-time lows. Can you figure it out? I can't.

Onto more of the news:

 

A rally in diagnostics stocks was triggered last week by earnings from for major players. This week,  the AACC (American Association of Clinical Chemistry) meeting could add fuel to the fire, when close to 20,000 clinical lab professionals and over 500 exhibitors gather to discuss key industry developments.

As of mid-morning trading, many diagnostic stocks are up 2%. Here is a financial summary from last week's earnings announcements:

    7/26/2010 2010          
Company Symbol P $ Q2 Rev $ Q2 EPS PEG P/S Sh.Equity $  
Cepheid CPHD 16.5 49.6 -0.03 n/a 4.8 137  
Immucor BLUD 19.3 82.9 0.3 1.27 3.87 439  
Meridian VIVO 19.5 33.9 0.16 1.72 5.4 139  
Neogen NEOG 28.3 39 0.2 1.66 3.8 153  
                 

Among the topics that will be covered in Plenary Sessions at the AACC are: Biomarkers for Alzheimer Disease, the Changing Healthcare Landscape, Stem Cells, Inflammation and Cardiovascular Disease and Systems Medicine (P4).

There are several symposia such as Personalized Medicine and Immunosuppression in Solid Organ Transplantation. Laboratory medicine topics are very broad including diabetes, endocrinogy testing, pharmacogenomics,lipid management and sepsis diagnosis. The conference program is here.

Our focus for the Meeting will be companies in the "Tools and Diagnostics" area as well as hot topics in laboratory medicine. Some players exhibiting in our universe in addition to those four above are: Abaxis (ABAX), Alera (ALA), GenProbe (GPRO), Luminex (LMNX), Quidel (QDEL), SeraCare (SRLS) and ThermoFisher (TMO) .

Rod N. Raynovich is the principal with Raygent Associates, a biotech consultancy, as well as a regular contributor to The Rayno Report.

Calix shares got hammered pretty hard on Friday after the company issued weak earnings guidance on the quarter. But investors might have been panicking about a whole lot of nothing.

In fact, more intrepid investors might look at why the earnings forecast were down: More R&D spending, possibly related to more big customers. But on Friday this did not matter, investors were in no mood for optimism. The earnings started out well enough: The company announced record revenues that were up 50% from the year-earlier period. In the pre-market, shares were up 10%.

Then the conference call came. The company gave revenue guidance of $70-$75 million and said earnings would only be in the 4 to 8-cent range. Most analysts had earnings of 14 cents or so. Most analysts were also expecting $80 million in revenue.